From:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: 3rd Try: Maybe an asm problem? (Problems linking)
Date:	Mon, 01 May 2000 21:13:49 +0400
Organization:	MTU-Intel ISP
Lines:	30
Message-ID:	<390DBB4D.8428C0FB@mtu-net.ru>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000501140345 DOT 10196A-100000 AT is> <390D67E4 DOT C48A1A4F AT mtu-net DOT ru> <390D84C5 DOT 197E6545 AT maths DOT unine DOT ch> <390D93E1 DOT 74B5DFB2 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <390DA810 DOT EC01A2E7 AT maths DOT unine DOT ch>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp98-196.dialup.mtu-net.ru
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	gavrilo.mtu.ru 957201305 51270 212.188.98.196 (1 May 2000 17:15:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Date:	1 May 2000 17:15:05 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en,ru
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Gautier wrote:
> > Okay, why not to freeze up DOS programs, due to task switch (it's possible to
> > know when a task switch occurs)?
> 
> Maybe there is another "Freeze me" Int2F that provides it ?

Nope. :) Maybe freeze all the programs using Int 2Fh (1681h) :))

It may also hang Win 95 as well as "l: cli\n jmp l", if followed by infinite
loop. :))

> Anyway the difference is not that big, so the "Release time slice" is
> still useful - better than no Int2F at all...

Yeah, that's right. Better than nothing. :)

> In addition, the program may have a bit more than nothing to do, but just
> a few, that can be done slowly.
> 
> In fact you can/wish simply use a task switcher instead of preemptive multitasker
> ("taskmgr /s" instead of "taskmgr") :-)

"/s"? Explain, plz.

bye.
Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru

- Raw text -