Date:	Mon, 1 May 2000 19:29:22 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: 3rd Try: Maybe an asm problem? (Problems linking)
In-Reply-To:	<390D93E1.74B5DFB2@mtu-net.ru>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000501192424.11979G@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 1 May 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:

> Okay, why not to freeze up DOS programs, due to task switch (it's possible to
> know when a task switch occurs)?

When the task switch occurs, you don't need to do anything, because the 
CPU is taken away from the DOS program.

__dpmi_yield is used when the calling program *does* have the CPU, but 
doesn't have anything to do with that CPU time.

- Raw text -