From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: attribute stdcall
Date:	Wed, 26 Apr 2000 16:55:04 +0200
Organization:	NetVision Israel
Lines:	19
Message-ID:	<39070348.732B115A@is.elta.co.il>
References:	<8AyN4.3395$fv3 DOT 5373032 AT nnrp6 DOT proxad DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ras1-p116.rvt.netvision.net.il
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	news.netvision.net.il 956757284 9186 62.0.172.118 (26 Apr 2000 13:54:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT netvision DOT net DOT il
NNTP-Posting-Date:	26 Apr 2000 13:54:44 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en,ru,hebrew
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Alexandre Devaure wrote:
> 
> Has sombody ever had compilation problem with a function declared with the
> attribute stdcall with gcc 2.95?
> 
> static bool F_WriteWords(int *_VP_Addr,int _V_Off,int _V_Lng)
> __attribute__((stdcall));
> static bool F_WriteWords(int *_VP_Addr,int _V_Off,int _V_Lng)
> {
>     body
> }
> 
> the result is :
> bmra.c:120: previous declaration of `F_WriteWords'
> bmra.c:165: conflicting types for `F_Init'

Your prototype disagrees with the function's definition, so the compiler
complains.  You need to use the __attribute__((stdcall)) thing in the
definition as well, and then it will work.

- Raw text -