delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Richard Dawe <richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: gdb problem or just silly me - please help |
Date: | Tue, 25 Apr 2000 20:15:17 +0100 |
Organization: | Customer of Planet Online |
Lines: | 20 |
Message-ID: | <3905EEC5.836F724B@bigfoot.com> |
References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000425112446 DOT 23128H-100000 AT is> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | modem-88.argon.dialup.pol.co.uk |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Trace: | newsg4.svr.pol.co.uk 956698205 17366 62.136.17.88 (25 Apr 2000 21:30:05 GMT) |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | 25 Apr 2000 21:30:05 GMT |
X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT theplanet DOT net |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14 i586) |
X-Accept-Language: | de,fr |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Hello. Eli Zaretskii wrote: > The problem with using -gstabs+ by default is that SYMIFY doesn't > support stabs, so -gstabs+ renders stack tracebacks unusable, unless > you run the program inside GDB or RHIDE. > > If and when someone teaches SYMIFY about stabs, DJGPP will probably > switch to -gstabs+ as the default. Eli, ISTR that you had a BFD version of symify that did work with stabs+ debugging. Maybe I am confused, but is this the case? I remember you sent me bfdsymify when I had some weird debugging problems, which we never got to the bottom of. Bye, -- Richard Dawe richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com ICQ 47595498 http://www.bigfoot.com/~richdawe/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |