From:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: inefficiency of GCC output code & -O problem
Date:	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 17:44:24 +0400
Organization:	MTU-Intel ISP
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<38FC66B8.BDE360B3@mtu-net.ru>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000418120905 DOT 28255f-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp103-164.dialup.mtu-net.ru
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	gavrilo.mtu.ru 956069919 18329 212.188.103.164 (18 Apr 2000 14:58:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Date:	18 Apr 2000 14:58:39 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en,ru
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Cyrix 6x86.
Originally it was P266, but something burnt out and now it doesn't work on
frequencies higher than 133MHz anymore. IMHO a good CPU, but you may disagree.
At least it's enough for me. :)

-- 
Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:
> 
> > It's not wrong, since I don't get your results with (USEC=USEC2=1 and -O
> > switch). I get it *slower*. And I have no idea what's up.
> 
> Perhaps the differences in CPUs are the reason.  I believe Dieter has a
> K6.  What's your CPU?

- Raw text -