From:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: inefficiency of GCC output code & -O problem
Date:	Tue, 18 Apr 2000 11:31:15 +0400
Organization:	MTU-Intel ISP
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<38FC0F43.87E209B3@mtu-net.ru>
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10004180455310 DOT 1540-100000 AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net> <38FBB719 DOT 3915C530 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <8dgvat DOT 3vvqu6v DOT 0 AT buerssner-17104 DOT user DOT cis DOT dfn DOT de>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp101-157.dialup.mtu-net.ru
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	gavrilo.mtu.ru 956043538 86544 212.188.101.157 (18 Apr 2000 07:38:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Date:	18 Apr 2000 07:38:58 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en,ru
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Dieter Buerssner wrote:
> >Yes, we have proved. We also haven't trow away all my inline ASM. The
> >FIDIVRL trick is still alive. :)
> 
> Wrong. 

It's not wrong, since I don't get your results with (USEC=USEC2=1 and -O
switch). I get it *slower*. And I have no idea what's up.

> Put the source I sent you on your homepage, so everybody still
> interested can judge. I stand by my claim, that I have disabled
> *all* your inline assembly in T_Map(), and got the same FPS.

I'll put it.

bye.
Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru

- Raw text -