From:	buers AT gmx DOT de (Dieter Buerssner)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: inefficiency of GCC output code & -O problem
Date:	18 Apr 2000 06:31:09 GMT
Lines:	13
Message-ID:	<8dh0tn.3vvqu6v.0@buerssner-17104.user.cis.dfn.de>
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10004180455310 DOT 1540-100000 AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	pec-104-133.tnt5.s2.uunet.de (149.225.104.133)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	fu-berlin.de 956039469 8119095 149.225.104.133 (16 [17104])
X-Posting-Agent:	Hamster/1.3.13.0
User-Agent:	Xnews/03.02.04
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel wrote:

>It once again proved that a good optimising compiler can do a excellent
>job...also the wisdom of running a profiler and seing which routines take
>up most time...

I can say one thing in the defense of Alexei. I don't know, whether
he used the profiler, or not. But there is profiling code in his 
sources. I did a very quick profile of his code. IHMO, he correctly
identified the bottlenecks.

-- 
Regards, Dieter

- Raw text -