From:	pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com, Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 16:51:24 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: Odp: CWSDPMI r5
Message-ID:	<38FB410C.26753.D0CA35@localhost>
In-reply-to:	<38fb0abe.14549824@news.freeserve.net>
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 17 Apr 2000, at 12:59, Steamer wrote:

> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> >No, the FAQ doesn't refer to GCC 2.96, it refers to 2.95.2, which is 
> >correct ;-).
> 
> I haven't checked the on-line version of your excellent FAQ, but the copy I
> have on my hard drive refers to GCC 2.96 twice (in sections 14.2 and 22.11).
> 

It's really there (references to gcc-2.96)

Also:
In FAQ (14.2):   
(For PGCC and GCC version 2.95 and later, use -O6 instead of -O2.)

For all versions of gcc (including gcc-2.95.2) optimization levels higher 
than -O3 is taken as -O3, only for PGCC -O4, -O5,... have some 
meaning)

Andris

- Raw text -