Date:	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 17:04:21 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Steamer <dontmailme AT iname DOT com>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Odp: CWSDPMI r5
In-Reply-To:	<38fb0abe.14549824@news.freeserve.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000417170152.18107B@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Steamer wrote:

> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> >No, the FAQ doesn't refer to GCC 2.96, it refers to 2.95.2, which is 
> >correct ;-).
> 
> I haven't checked the on-line version of your excellent FAQ, but the copy I
> have on my hard drive refers to GCC 2.96 twice (in sections 14.2 and 22.11).

I was talking about section 4.4, where the packages are listed.  It 
references GCC 2.95.2.

The references to GCC 2.96 which you mentioned are correct: they describe 
the features in the GCC snapshots that will be released as version 2.96.  
Unlike CWSDPMI, these GCC snapshots can be downloaded and compiled, if 
anyone wants those features right now.

- Raw text -