Message-ID:	<38FABF19.EA155238@mtu-net.ru>
Date:	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 11:36:57 +0400
From:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en,ru
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Fwd: Re: Help with Inline ASM...
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000417102032 DOT 14867G-100000 AT is>
X-Recipient:	eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:
> 
> > Damian Yerrick wrote:
> > > Wasn't the "flat model" discussed before here?  I think we called
> > > DJGPP's model a "32-bit tiny model."
> >
> > Well, what's the actual difference of these terms in your opinion?
> 
> Damian refers to the same discussion I mentioned earlier in this thread.
> In that discussion, the differences between these terms were beaten to
> death, several times.
> 
> In addition, I explained, again, why DJGPP's memory model is not flat
> in this thread yesterday.

We will never reach the end of this discussion. Let's just give up with it. How
you call DJGPP's memory model doesn't affect my code and how I call it doesn't
affect yours. I'm stopping this thread, since we have not reached common
conclusion and that's not a serious subject to talk about.

bye.
Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru

- Raw text -