From:	Nate Eldredge <neldredge AT hmc DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: inefficiency of GCC output code & -O problem
Date:	16 Apr 2000 16:54:33 -0700
Organization:	InterWorld Communications
Lines:	16
Message-ID:	<83em85mwjq.fsf@mercury.st.hmc.edu>
References:	<38F98775 DOT E0FB9148 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <83vh1hn60e DOT fsf AT mercury DOT st DOT hmc DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	mercury.st.hmc.edu
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	nntp1.interworld.net 955929539 17936 134.173.45.219 (16 Apr 2000 23:58:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT nntp1 DOT interworld DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date:	16 Apr 2000 23:58:59 GMT
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.5
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Nate Eldredge <neldredge AT hmc DOT edu> writes:

> "Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru> writes:
> 
> > By *official* I mean correct/valid description of inline
> > asm. I.e. one that doesn't make you to correct my inline asm as you
> > were doing all the time. :)
> 
> The section in the GCC manual is as effective as it gets.  When that

Err, as *official* as it gets, I meant to say.

-- 

Nate Eldredge
neldredge AT hmc DOT edu

- Raw text -