Date:	Mon, 17 Apr 2000 10:22:26 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Fwd: Re: Help with Inline ASM...
In-Reply-To:	<38FAA555.2C9083AB@mtu-net.ru>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000417102032.14867G-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:

> Damian Yerrick wrote:
> > Wasn't the "flat model" discussed before here?  I think we called
> > DJGPP's model a "32-bit tiny model."
> 
> Well, what's the actual difference of these terms in your opinion?

Damian refers to the same discussion I mentioned earlier in this thread.  
In that discussion, the differences between these terms were beaten to 
death, several times.

In addition, I explained, again, why DJGPP's memory model is not flat
in this thread yesterday.

- Raw text -