delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | "OiSyN" <mailme AT oisyn DOT com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: alternative malloc |
Date: | Sun, 16 Apr 2000 21:49:05 +0200 |
Message-ID: | <955914263.15211.0.pluto.d4ee0fa5@news.demon.nl> |
References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000416105208 DOT 2482l-100000 AT is> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | x-project.demon.nl |
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: | x-project.demon.nl:212.238.15.165 |
X-Trace: | news.demon.nl 955914263 pluto:15211 NO-IDENT x-project.demon.nl:212.238.15.165 |
X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT nl DOT demon DOT net |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Newsreader: | Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 |
Lines: | 14 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
> If your program has replacements for malloc, free, and realloc, then > the linker will use them instead of the versions in the library. > > But you *must* implement all the 3 functions, since the library > version has them all on a single module. Ah... I only wrote a malloc and a free, but it didn't work... Thanx! OiSyN mailme AT oisyn DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |