From:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: inefficiency of GCC output code & -O problem
Date:	Sun, 16 Apr 2000 13:27:17 +0400
Organization:	MTU-Intel ISP
Lines:	21
Message-ID:	<38F98775.E0FB9148@mtu-net.ru>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp97-187.dialup.mtu-net.ru
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	gavrilo.mtu.ru 955887109 21507 212.188.97.187 (16 Apr 2000 12:11:49 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Date:	16 Apr 2000 12:11:49 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en,ru
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

By *official* I mean correct/valid description of inline asm. I.e. one that
doesn't make you to correct my inline asm as you were doing all the time. :)

Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:
> 
> > Are there any official ones on the AT&T x86 asm syntax and inline asm?
> 
> I'm not sure I understand what do you mean by ``official''.
> 
> The DJGPP FAQ has some pointers to docs and tutorials about these
> issues.

- Raw text -