delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Vinzent Hoefler <JeLlyFish DOT software AT gmx DOT net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: MICROSOFT has Bought Over Linus Torvalds!! |
Date: | Thu, 13 Apr 2000 22:38:27 +0200 |
Organization: | JeLlyFish software |
Lines: | 24 |
Message-ID: | <8d5b8o$1it$1@news08.btx.dtag.de> |
References: | <38EF20D0 DOT 5550EADC AT bigfoot DOT com> <00041114440503 DOT 10635 AT sparky DOT lineo DOT com> <38F4F2D4 DOT 87A2AB6 AT bigfoot DOT com> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Trace: | news08.btx.dtag.de 955658328 1629 777000109768-0002 000413 20:38:48 |
X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT t-online DOT de |
X-Sender: | 777000109768-0002 AT t-dialin DOT net |
X-Newsreader: | Forte Agent 1.7/16.534 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Richard Dawe <richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com> wrote: [Windows95C and the AMD K6-II/350 Patch] >> So if you have an intel or Cyrix processor, it will work? > >Truthfully, I do not know. At the moment it does. But who knows, we all know that faster processors already caused so many delay loops to fail over the time... ;-) >I don't think there is a problem with these >processors, since I have not seen an equivalent patch for Intel or Cyrix >processors. That's correct. Their LOOP instruction simply isn't fast enough to cause overflow. Vinzent. -- The best optimizer is between your ears. -- Michael Abrash
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |