From:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Tsr's how?
Date:	Wed, 12 Apr 2000 01:30:48 +0400
Organization:	MTU-Intel ISP
Lines:	29
Message-ID:	<38F39988.5E220DD6@mtu-net.ru>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000411133337 DOT 4929O-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp98-177.dialup.mtu-net.ru
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	gavrilo.mtu.ru 955552964 52432 212.188.98.177 (12 Apr 2000 15:22:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Date:	12 Apr 2000 15:22:44 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en,ru
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Yes, real-mode TSR for DOS.

IMHO writing such huge TSRs is a bit stupid. This may be good only for
beginners. Btw, DPMI-based TSR is not a very good thing too.

bye.
Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:
> 
> > I'd rather write it in pure ASM. Btw, I have one that saves screen (in text
> > mode) to file SCR_XXXX. XXXX is a number of the screenshot. And it's increased
> > after each save.
> >
> > Program in DJGPP would be about 70KB plus CWSDPMI. :))
> > Mine (in ASM) is 5KB.
> 
> You mean, in real-mode assembly, right?
> 
> Writing a program in assembly doesn't necessarily mean it is a non-DJGPP
> program.  If it is a DJGPP program, it will need the DJGPP startup code
> and CWSDPMI, even if the program's source is pure assembly.

- Raw text -