X-Originating-Host:	195.154.148.69
Organization:	http://www.remarq.com: The World's Usenet/Discussions Start Here
Subject:	Re: Problems on making a .exe file
Lines:	16
From:	Clemens Valens <c DOT valensNOc DOT SPAM AT mindless DOT com DOT invalid>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Message-ID:	<04967c1c.78baf4b7@usw-ex0101-007.remarq.com>
References:	<482568BE DOT 00289DE8 DOT 00 AT mercury DOT shanghaigm DOT com>
Bytes:	769
X-Wren-Trace:	eGVAaGlwN302Jj97YSlhYmRWeGluZSl2c3okZWN8PHQzNms1PnE+Oj08LzYy
Date:	Tue, 11 Apr 2000 04:31:56 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host:	10.0.2.7
X-Complaints-To:	wrenabuse AT remarq DOT com
X-Trace:	WReNphoon4 955452734 10.0.2.7 (Tue, 11 Apr 2000 04:32:14 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Tue, 11 Apr 2000 04:32:14 PDT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Having them in a header file is not enough. A header file
usually only contains some definitions so the compiler knows
what to expect. The linker needs to have the actual code to
biuld a program. So when the linker complains that items are
undefined, this usually means that you forgot to compile
something or that you didn't tell the linker the name of the
library where it can find the items it was looking for.

Did you run a makefile for your network stuff? If so, you
probably have a new library (lib???.a file) somewhere. Find it
and feed it to the linker together with your application.

Clemens

* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!

- Raw text -