From:	iam AT not DOT you (Ken Power)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: classes
Message-ID:	<38edfb0e.12430278@news.mysolution.com>
References:	<eeLF4.13555$K9 DOT 107792 AT typhoon DOT nyroc DOT rr DOT com> <v7umesob3dvcog3a0nhe9e8h4trging7v5 AT 4ax DOT com> <38eda615 DOT 11483373 AT news DOT mysolution DOT com> <200004061957 DOT PAA14708 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
MIME-Version:	1.0
Lines:	22
X-Abuse-Info:	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info:	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Complaints-To:	support AT usenetserver DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Fri, 07 Apr 2000 11:18:40 EDT
Organization:	WebUseNet Corp http://www.usenetserver.com - Home of the fastest NNTP servers on the Net.
Date:	Fri, 07 Apr 2000 15:14:46 GMT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Thu, 6 Apr 2000 15:57:51 -0400, in comp.os.msdos.djgpp, DJ Delorie
<dj AT delorie DOT com> managed to squeak:

>
>> Similar yes, but with 'added' features. AFAICR, structs, in the c++
>> standard, do not support private, public, or protected features that
>> classes do. In other words:
>
>Wrong.  "struct" and "class" are *identical* except for the default
>protection.  There are no other differences between structs and
>classes.  Even the parser doesn't treat them differently.
>
>I often ask about this in interviews to see if the candidate really
>understands structs and classes in C++.  Most don't.
Ha, guess I should compare my memory versus hard fact :) Goo thing I'm
still in the learning stage, else I might be in worse trouble. Thanks
everyone for clearing my own understanding.
KP
--------------------------------
Ken Power
uncle_wiggly at bigfoot dot com
--------------------------------

- Raw text -