From:	"Campbell, Rolf [SKY:1U32:EXCH]" <moscoop AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Is DOS dead?
Date:	Fri, 07 Apr 2000 11:31:52 -0400
Organization:	Nortel Networks
Lines:	21
Message-ID:	<38EDFF68.D7F0EBBC@americasm01.nt.com>
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10004040520420 DOT 1275-100000 AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net> <38E9F66B DOT C241F764 AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com> <7m8lescc82a758ergcj4k26c8uqkosev9q AT 4ax DOT com> <38EB5725 DOT 18ABD810 AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com> <h7smes0mn3d3ukh91go77sql2noi4185ir AT 4ax DOT com> <38eca548 DOT 11278379 AT news DOT mysolution DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	wmerh0tk.ca.nortel.com
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72C-CCK-MCD [en] (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/785)
X-Accept-Language:	en
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Ken Power wrote:

> >>What type of 'associatation' do you mean?  Wouldn't this have to be a
> >>file-manager specific task?
> >Yes, and it would come as the default in decent file managers.
> Perhaps I am wrong, but with the newer linux kernels (2.2.x) one has
> the ability to execute MISC binaries. From what I have read it appears
> one can associate a file/executable with the proper loader (java class
> files with a jvm, etc). No, I have never done it myself, nor have I
> thoroughly searched to see how this is done, but I know it does not
> depend on X or a window manager (though they also give similar
> abilites).

That makes the assumption that the rpm's will be executable, which I
doubt...

--
(\/) Rolf Campbell (\/)

- Raw text -