From:	jstacey AT plato DOT wadham DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk (J-P)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Linking in .a files from within RHIDE
Date:	7 Apr 2000 11:29:42 +0100
Organization:	Wadham College Oxford
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<8ckdam$343$1@plato.wadham.ox.ac.uk>
References:	<8ciba7$ttq$1 AT plato DOT wadham DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk> <38ECD3B0 DOT FE8403F8 AT hotmail DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	plato.wadham.ox.ac.uk
X-Trace:	news.ox.ac.uk 955103383 28519 163.1.164.74 (7 Apr 2000 10:29:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	newsmaster AT ox DOT ac DOT uk
NNTP-Posting-Date:	7 Apr 2000 10:29:43 GMT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <38ECD3B0 DOT FE8403F8 AT hotmail DOT com>,
Andrew Hakman  <hakmana AT hotmail DOT com> wrote:
>When linking a .a file using RHIDE, if the file has lib???.a, go to
>OPTIONS->Libraries, type the name but chop the "lib" and ".a" parts off, then
>click the checkbox beside it's name. It should now link in properly.
>Example: to include libemu.a   type    emu    and check the box to the left of
>it.

Thanks. Works like a charm. Out of interest, is there any way of stopping
both gcc via RHIDE and command-line gcc from including all the POSIX stuff
and thus speeding up compile time?

I noticed two things - the hack mentioned in the FAQ about getting rid of
some of gcc's automatically included functions, and the checkbox under
OPTIONS\LIBRARIES that says "include default libraries." Can I happily run
a non-POSIX program by removing libc.a linking? It's again me trying to
convince my supervisor to move from Turbo C... :) His main complaint at
the moment is compile time.

J-P
-- 
ghosts! // lake phonebooth // contact lens origami // ceramic teeth 

- Raw text -