From:	Nate Eldredge <neldredge AT hmc DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Is DOS dead?
Date:	05 Apr 2000 12:28:41 -0700
Organization:	InterWorld Communications
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<83em8kpct2.fsf@mercury.st.hmc.edu>
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10004040520420 DOT 1275-100000 AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net> <38E9F66B DOT C241F764 AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com> <7m8lescc82a758ergcj4k26c8uqkosev9q AT 4ax DOT com> <38EB5725 DOT 18ABD810 AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	mercury.st.hmc.edu
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	nntp1.interworld.net 954962931 40374 134.173.45.219 (5 Apr 2000 19:28:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT nntp1 DOT interworld DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date:	5 Apr 2000 19:28:51 GMT
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.5
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

"Campbell, Rolf [SKY:1U32:EXCH]" <moscoop AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com> writes:

> Damian Yerrick wrote:
> 
> > >How hard would it be to make a executable with an embedded RPM image
> > >so that when it was executed, it installed itself?  I doubt it would
> > >be very hard, and I think that's the way rpm's should be done (it
> > >looks much more attractive to Windows users)
> > Or just automatically associate RPM archives with `rpm -U'.
> 
> What type of 'associatation' do you mean?  Wouldn't this have to be a
> file-manager specific task?

Hm, or have foo.rpm contain

#! /usr/bin/rpm -U
...rest of rpm file

-- 

Nate Eldredge
neldredge AT hmc DOT edu

- Raw text -