From:	Damian Yerrick <Bullcr_pd_yerrick AT hotmail DOT comRemoveBullcr_p>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Is DOS dead?
Organization:	Pin Eight Software http://pineight.8m.com/
Message-ID:	<7m8lescc82a758ergcj4k26c8uqkosev9q@4ax.com>
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10004040520420 DOT 1275-100000 AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net> <38E9F66B DOT C241F764 AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com>
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version:	1.0
Lines:	17
X-Trace:	/w3Za7OOhjkEEKlXULiMtzjjmHVcnDYpg3gJm7COrDUwd1OuxIGOijiBSLCnquLxt3xKEZYGUdha!ihiucaT1tRU+1MKLK1AIPO8omlzPFck4ABtuDQ7QjIVKBg9vQApk2aWeVBvorsIEKV9SZkzPNg6X!Y8k=
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT gte DOT net
X-Abuse-Info:	Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-Info:	Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Wed, 05 Apr 2000 04:18:42 GMT
Distribution:	world
Date:	Wed, 05 Apr 2000 04:18:42 GMT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 04 Apr 2000 10:04:27 -0400, "Campbell, Rolf [SKY:1U32:EXCH]"
<moscoop AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com> wrote:

>How hard would it be to make a executable with an embedded RPM image
>so that when it was executed, it installed itself?  I doubt it would
>be very hard, and I think that's the way rpm's should be done (it
>looks much more attractive to Windows users)

Or just automatically associate RPM archives with `rpm -U'.

-- 
Damian Yerrick
"I refuse to listen to those who refuse to listen to reason."
See the whole sig: http://www.rose-hulman.edu/~yerricde/sig.html

This is McAfee VirusScan. Add these two lines to your signature to
prevent the spread of signature viruses.  http://www.mcafee.com/

- Raw text -