X-Originating-Host:	202.158.46.2
Organization:	http://www.remarq.com: The World's Usenet/Discussions Start Here
Subject:	Re: VBE question
Lines:	19
From:	batchex <thedark1NOthSPAM AT phreaker DOT net DOT invalid>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Message-ID:	<16d6b1d0.f3229061@usw-ex0105-036.remarq.com>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000402104459 DOT 9367h-100000 AT is>
Bytes:	702
X-Wren-Trace:	ePXQ+Pngp+2moen49LTm97bG9fji9LTo9eu0+Pn1rOeqofulru2ur6+6ow==
Date:	Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:40:20 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host:	10.0.2.36
X-Complaints-To:	wrenabuse AT remarq DOT com
X-Trace:	WReNphoon2 954797733 10.0.2.36 (Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:35:33 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:35:33 PDT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000402104459 DOT 9367h-100000 AT is>, Eli
Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> wrote:
>
>On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, batchex wrote:
>
>> I've got around this problem by enabling near pointer and add
>> __djgpp_conventional_base_address to it.
>
>BAD idea, IMHO.  Why compromise your system's integrity and
stability for
>no good reason?  Section 18.7 of the FAQ shows a better way of
doing this.
>
How does DPMI function 0x508 sound? Does all memory protection
still enabled? Can I access the mapped address by near pointers?


* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!

- Raw text -