From:	"Campbell, Rolf [SKY:1U32:EXCH]" <moscoop AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Allegro and interrupts
Date:	Mon, 03 Apr 2000 14:07:28 -0400
Organization:	Nortel Networks
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<38E8DDE0.58645519@americasm01.nt.com>
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10004021749430 DOT 916-100000 AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	wmerh0tk.ca.nortel.com
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72C-CCK-MCD [en] (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/785)
X-Accept-Language:	en
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel wrote:

> I must confess that my panic at using FPU insns in game programming comes
> from the fact that I learnt game programming in the time when using the
> FPU was slooow, and everyone wrote code using sin and cos lookup tables
> etc.
>
> FWIW Even the allegro game programming library comes with a integer based
> floating point emulation rountines.
>
> I certainly agree that speed of FPU rountines vs integer rountines are
> norrowing. I once read that on a certain processor the fmul was faster
> than the imul...

You should see the timings on the Athlon's.  FPU stuff is amazingly fast, but
even an imul is 1-2 clocks...

--
(\/) Rolf Campbell (\/)

- Raw text -