Mail Archives: djgpp/2000/03/31/16:43:43
You were right, the overclocking caused the compiler to crash. Now
everything seems to be fine.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
To: Artur Butryn <akaja AT MailAndNews DOT com>
Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Date: Friday, March 31, 2000 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: Compiler crash??
>
>
>I intentionally didn't strip executables in binary archives of DJGPP port
>of gcc-2.95.2. Information included in binaries is enough for symify to
>provide stack trace but not enough for debuggers. So use it to get
>more info. Read DJGPP FAQ if needed. There were more than one update of
>port of gcc-2.95.2, so I don't know which one You have.
>
>Also STOP OVERCLOCKING Your CPU and look whether problem goes away.
> =================
>
>Andris
>
>
>On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Artur Butryn wrote:
>
>> I have following problem. Very often when I try to compile something a
>> following errror message is displayed.
>>
>>
>> Compiling: test.cpp
>> Exiting due to signal SIGILL
>> Invalid Opcode at eip=00007201
>> eax=00000020 ebx=00000120 ecx=50f4c483 edx=00000149 esi=001b7314
>> edi=001bd84
>> ebp=001a9f78 esp=001a9f10
program=C:\DJGPP\LIB\GCC-LIB\DJGPP\2.952\CPP.EXE
>> sel=0457 base=82fb3000 limit=001cffff
>> sel=045f base=82fb3000 limit=001cffff
>> sel=045f base=82fb3000 limit=001cffff
>> sel=0437 base=00016180 limit=0000ffff
>> sel=046f base=00000000 limit=0010ffff
>> sel=045f base=82fb3000 limit=001cffff
>> App stack: [001aa718..00033718] Exceptn stack: [00033624..000316e4]
>> Call frame traceback EIPs:
>> 0x00007201
>> 0x0000a48e
>> 0x00009975
>> 0x00008639
>> 0x000067fb
>> 0x0000a48e
>> 0x00009975
>> 0x00008639
>> 0x000067fb
>> 0x0000a48e
>> 0x00009975
>> 0x00008639
>> 0x000067fb
>> 0x00005940
>> 0x00017bfe
>> There were some errors
>>
>>
>> I'm using:
>> Cyrix P166+ (overclocked to 200Mhz)
>> 32Mb RAM
>> WIN 95
>> lotsa disk space
>>
>> The same thing happens when I quit to DOS and run DJPP with CWSDPMI.EXE
>> I check in FAQ but there was no inf on this sort of behaviour.
>> Is it some sort of compiler bug?
>>
>> Akaja
>>
>>
>
>
- Raw text -