From:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Interrupt wrapper (was Re: keyboard interrupt)
Date:	Tue, 28 Mar 2000 20:57:00 +0400
Organization:	MTU-Intel ISP
Lines:	15
Message-ID:	<38E0E45C.DCDF156@mtu-net.ru>
References:	<8bod7h$rj1$1 AT gxsn DOT com> <38DFBF98 DOT 8BEB44EB AT corel DOT com> <38DFE9E5 DOT 37B0F318 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <38E0B41D DOT 4046948D AT corel DOT com> <38E0BD61 DOT CF54CF91 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <38E0DC7C DOT CE330DAB AT corel DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp111-55.dialup.mtu-net.ru
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	gavrilo.mtu.ru 954262723 24800 212.188.111.55 (28 Mar 2000 16:58:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Date:	28 Mar 2000 16:58:43 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en,ru
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Jonathan Meunier wrote:
> Oh, sorry, I just thought a wrapper would do more than that.. well, it's
> already doing enough (preventing program from potential crash).

Sure. It's the main reason.

> Thanks for sharing your knowledge ;)

Not at all. :)

Alexei A. Frounze
-- 
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru

- Raw text -