delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se (Martin Stromberg) |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: EXE files too big! |
Date: | 27 Mar 2000 07:45:37 GMT |
Organization: | Ericsson Erisoft AB, Sweden |
Lines: | 18 |
Message-ID: | <8bn3j1$6ct$1@antares.lu.erisoft.se> |
References: | <8bjhuu$8pt$1 AT newssrv DOT otenet DOT gr> <o0mqdskei6jkr3or9b64skepq1ja7h5dsm AT 4ax DOT com> <38DECB5D DOT 3C38247B AT gtcom DOT net> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | lws256.lu.erisoft.se |
X-Newsreader: | TIN [version 1.2 PL2] |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Krogg (krogg DOT no DOT to DOT spam AT gtcom DOT net) wrote: : I am gonna try one more thing.... : Ok i tried the -s switch and the -O2 switch AND upx. : ended up with..........................119268 bytes : Now,that IS a little better...Now someone is gonna : tell me that the -O2 switch is some kind of bad thing : that i will wish i hadnt ever heard of...... Au contraire. If your program isn't very special, it's very much recommended that you do compile with "-O2". It's insane not to use at least "-O"; if you don't believe me, look at the code generated by gcc without "-O". Right, MartinS
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |