delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Damian Yerrick <Bullcr_pd_yerrick AT hotmail DOT comRemoveBullcr_p> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.msdos.programmer |
Subject: | Re: Detecting Windows and Windows directory from DOS |
Organization: | Pin Eight Software http://pineight.8m.com/ |
Message-ID: | <3e9kdsg7atb0600ohhcpgso7t686t086pf@4ax.com> |
References: | <8am5ub$o0v$1 AT news6 DOT svr DOT pol DOT co DOT uk> <38D108E3 DOT D9821E3B AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com> <8arkm8$m3h$1 AT newsg2 DOT svr DOT pol DOT co DOT uk> <qft2dsk6mso6suit8q0aikucnffq0cb77q AT 4ax DOT com> <38D1EFAA DOT 7A48D29D AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <38D6844B DOT 876E5631 AT bigfoot DOT com> <MPG DOT 134160c4f0a1f29b98ae44 AT news DOT mindspring DOT com> <38D7E5F5 DOT ED6FB969 AT bigfoot DOT com> <MPG DOT 134208384d03df7798ae4c AT news DOT mindspring DOT com> <38D931BC DOT 4421EB34 AT bigfoot DOT com> |
X-Newsreader: | Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Lines: | 36 |
X-Trace: | /bCCZDD5WYy8sNQiMOP97Y7O+uUm4ykzpb5Q2qDHKEcbWRILqWbBhpxbR2FCJaWu0uIrOxvTzZdj!t8uKPsSeIzFwscXI8VtS3/ycWyz4RMC1meGaWMlSOjLGio5Fgb5FCwIZ+KcI1FxnF8fAnZFlFlWd!DOvF |
X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT gte DOT net |
X-Abuse-Info: | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
X-Abuse-Info: | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:13:54 GMT |
Distribution: | world |
Date: | Thu, 23 Mar 2000 14:13:54 GMT |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000 20:49:00 +0000, Richard Dawe <richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com> wrote: >Hello. > >Stan Brown wrote: >> >> Said richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com (Richard Dawe) in >> comp.os.msdos.programmer: >> >By the way, I think you mean "in user code they _may_ lead to undefined >> >behavior" rather than "in user code they lead to undefined behavior", >> >which is a bit harsh. ;) >> >> No, I meant what I said. Undefined behavior means you can't count >> on it to do any particular thing. ><snip> > >OK, I take your point, I'm wrong - I guess I asked for this. I guess I >have this (incorrect) point of view from my pragmatic learning, i.e. the >compiler "defines" what is defined behaviour. The tools "define" anything marked as "implementation defined" in the spec. "Undefined" items remain undefined. >> It *may* lead to winged monkeys shooting out of your monitor, That would be cool. I'd run the program on my PII laptop in front of some zoologists :-) -- Damian Yerrick "I refuse to listen to those who refuse to listen to reason." See the whole sig: http://www.rose-hulman.edu/~yerricde/sig.html This is McAfee VirusScan. Add these two lines to your signature to prevent the spread of signature viruses. http://www.mcafee.com/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |