From:	Nate Eldredge <neldredge AT hmc DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: gcc-2.95.2 + bnu-2.9.5 cross compiler?
Date:	14 Mar 2000 14:05:52 -0800
Organization:	InterWorld Communications
Lines:	19
Message-ID:	<83em9dxl4v.fsf@mercury.st.hmc.edu>
References:	<Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 10003140944200 DOT 24404-100000 AT ieva05 DOT lanet DOT lv>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	mercury.st.hmc.edu
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	nntp1.interworld.net 953071675 3489 134.173.45.219 (14 Mar 2000 22:07:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT nntp1 DOT interworld DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date:	14 Mar 2000 22:07:55 GMT
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.5
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv> writes:

> 
> The problem with bnu2951s.zip will be that ZIP archive does not preserve
> correctly file attributes (execute permission is lost). So You have
> chmod needed files (eg. chmod +x configure). After that there should be
> no problems to build cross-binutils. Anyway I think that there should no
> serious problems also with not patched binutils snapshots (no patches from
> DJ's how-to needed then). So download recent snapshot from
> sourceware.cygnus.com (or mirror site) and build cross-binutils. 
> I used such way also for native builds of binutils for rather long time
> and didn't met serious problems.

Info-zip on Unix does store the permission bits.  What did you use?

-- 

Nate Eldredge
neldredge AT hmc DOT edu

- Raw text -