From:	Alexey Zakhlestine <alx AT gs707 DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: CGI
Date:	Tue, 14 Mar 2000 19:18:46 +0300
Organization:	MTU-Intel ISP
Lines:	9
Message-ID:	<38CE6666.B253EA84@gs707.com>
References:	<38CE5FF3 DOT 50D45DAA AT home DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp101-101.dialup.mtu-net.ru
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	gavrilo.mtu.ru 953050747 2182 212.188.101.101 (14 Mar 2000 16:19:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet-abuse AT mtu DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Date:	14 Mar 2000 16:19:07 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	ru,en
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

I don't see principal difference between CGI-executable and simple-executable.
In CGI you need to return "Content"-string, and optionally get parameters....
You can easily do that in C/C++, and it doesn't matter which compiler you use

--
Hi, I'm a signature virus. plz set me as your signature and help me spread
:)

- Raw text -