From:	pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Thu, 9 Mar 2000 19:05:09 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: explicit instantiation
Message-ID:	<38C7F5E5.11443.10DCA8A@localhost>
In-reply-to:	<lhafcs4o4kfmo0nrthkj9t0gleokh6cj4v@4ax.com>
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 9 Mar 2000, at 13:44, Damian Yerrick wrote:

> On Thu, 9 Mar 2000 10:08:52 +0100, "Niklas Pettersson"
> <npedt97@(nospam)student.vxu.se> wrote:
> 
> >Maybe you should consider using class instead of typename.
> >It's shorter and a more common way for C++ programmers to express
> >themselfs.
> 
> Does "class" instead of "typename" work with non-class primitive
> types such as int and float?
> 

I suggest going to bookstore and buying Stroustroup's 
"C++ programming language" and studying related topics.
It's too long to be answered here (and also slightly off-topic)

Andris

- Raw text -