From:	"Campbell, Rolf [SKY:1U32:EXCH]" <moscoop AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Inline asm
Date:	Tue, 07 Mar 2000 12:54:11 -0500
Organization:	Nortel Networks
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<38C54243.DB343A69@americasm01.nt.com>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000307101530 DOT 21628D-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	wmerh0tk.ca.nortel.com
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/785)
X-Accept-Language:	en
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Campbell, Rolf [SKY:1U32:EXCH] wrote:
>
> > __dpmi_regs regs;
> > memset(&regs, 0, sizeof(regs));  //I think this is optional for this
> > specific example
> > regs.x.ax = 0x13;
> > __dmpi_int(0x10, &regs);
>
> It is not necessary to zero-out regs when using __dpmi_int, since
> __dpmi_int zeroes out the parts that need that.

    Yes, but I think it is a good practise in general because some
interrupts act differently when other registers contain random values,
but maybe I'm over-reacting..

--
(\/) Rolf Campbell (\/)

- Raw text -