| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Sender: | "Rolf Campbell" <moscoop AT nortelnetworks DOT com> |
| Message-ID: | <38BFE6B7.A9D31ED8@americasm01.nt.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 03 Mar 2000 11:22:15 -0500 |
| From: | "Rolf Campbell" <moscoop AT nortelnetworks DOT com> |
| Organization: | Nortel Networks |
| X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/785) |
| X-Accept-Language: | en |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
| To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
| Subject: | C++, what is it (Was: Re: Fastest bitblt?) |
| References: | <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10003031823500 DOT 948-100000 AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net> |
| Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel wrote: > Damian Yerrick wrote > > C++ can do operator overloading, which converts farpokel() into > > an array access. farpoke* does not use operator overloading and will be optimized just as well in C as in C++. Although you could make a 'FarArray' class which changed array accessing into 'farpoke*' calls. > What about the poor guys (a lot of people BTW, just see how much of the > source out there is C) who program in C. > > BTW I love C++ but sometimes I get the feeling when I read statements like > the above that it is more a toolkit which you can use to "patch up" > various problematic designs (BTW I'm _not_ referring to DJGPP) rather than > a programming language. What do you mean by a toolkit for patching designs? -- (\/) Rolf Campbell (\/)
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |