From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Fastest bitblt?
Date:	Mon, 28 Feb 2000 12:05:57 +0200
Organization:	NetVision Israel
Lines:	10
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000228120242.10292B@is>
References:	<83mebssig8p8d943fekqr2sgumh48ermno AT 4ax DOT com> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 10002261941000 DOT 1032-100000 AT darkstar DOT grendel DOT net> <eojjbs4ondjp9r8k8e48ij0bq64h4t03s3 AT 4ax DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	is.elta.co.il
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	news.netvision.net.il 951732528 8145 199.203.121.2 (28 Feb 2000 10:08:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT netvision DOT net DOT il
NNTP-Posting-Date:	28 Feb 2000 10:08:48 GMT
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
In-Reply-To:	<eojjbs4ondjp9r8k8e48ij0bq64h4t03s3@4ax.com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Damian Yerrick wrote:

> Protected mode only provides a mechanism for memory protection; it
> doesn't require that operating systems provide such protection.

Not true.  Memory protection is built into protected mode, at least to 
some degree.  Access rights checking and segment-level protection are 
always active, as they are inherent to PM.  Page-level protection is 
optional.

- Raw text -