delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Thu, 24 Feb 2000 12:25:20 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Ken Yap <ken_yap AT my-deja DOT com> |
cc: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: why isn't the FSEXT hook implemented for dup in 2.03? |
In-Reply-To: | <890rpg$sf6$1@nnrp1.deja.com> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000224122458.13848R-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | dj-admin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Ken Yap wrote: > I found that there is no hook from dup to FSEXT, so I can't dup network > sockets in WATT-32. Why isn't the dup hook to FSEXT implemented yet? Two reasons: - It's tricky, since FSEXT itself calls dup internally (to produce a valid file handle that __FSEXT_alloc_fd returns). - When this was discussed, it seemed to be rather unnecessary to hook dup. Can you explain under what circumstances do you need this, and why?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |