Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
From:	manni DOT heumann AT gmx DOT de (Manni Heumann)
Subject:	Re: Uptime and entropy in DOS
Distribution:	world
References:	<lra6ascbh1fu2d4738d44h09kpooc8ecta AT 4ax DOT com> <38A5583C DOT EDF375B4 AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <591baskf2ns6u0n0l6kp8rgml7aa2q80la AT 4ax DOT com>
X-Newsreader:	News Xpress 2.01
Date:	Sat, 12 Feb 2000 18:13:37 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ppp36-200.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de
Message-ID:	<38a5a2da_1@news.uni-bielefeld.de>
X-Trace:	12 Feb 2000 19:13:46 +0200, ppp36-200.hrz.uni-bielefeld.de
Lines:	30
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <591baskf2ns6u0n0l6kp8rgml7aa2q80la AT 4ax DOT com>, REPLYTOd_yerrick AT hotmail DOT comNO2CANNEDHAM wrote:
>On Sat, 12 Feb 2000 14:55:24 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
>wrote:
>
>>Damian Yerrick wrote:
>>> 
>>> Is it possible to get the uptime of a DOS system?  I need more entropy
>>> than the 32 bits I get from time(NULL) to initialize a pseudorandom
>>> number generator.
>>
>>Did you try `uclock' or `gettiomeofday'?  It's in the FAQ (section 22.23).
>
>uclock() won't work because it measures uptime of the current process,
>which is *known* when the process starts, which is when I seed my PRNG
>and start Allegro.  And because Allegro reprograms the timer, I can't
>reseed from uclock() after the program starts.
>
>gettimeofday() won't work because it in theory can be calculated from
>time(NULL), which I'm already using, and adds no entropy.
>

I'm nosy: Why isn't all of this enough for you?
What about the user? How about a "Any key to continue" message and you measure 
the time it takes to answer that one and then combine it with time (NULL).


--

Manni

- Raw text -