From:	karpfenteich AT gmx DOT de (Peter Karp)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: DJGPP V2.03 versus V2.01
Date:	Fri, 11 Feb 2000 19:30:10 GMT
Organization:	1&1 Telekommunikation GmbH
Lines:	10
Message-ID:	<38a462f4.3964313@news.online.de>
References:	<200002101416 DOT PAA26109 AT smtp DOT wirehub DOT nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	p3e9bea12.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
X-Trace:	news.online.de 950297412 15063 62.155.234.18 (11 Feb 2000 19:30:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT online DOT de
NNTP-Posting-Date:	11 Feb 2000 19:30:12 GMT
X-Newsreader:	Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

>2. The program is 10 % bigger than with V2.01 ( same flags , yes -s flag to ).
> Compiled with V2.01 its 1253 KB
> Compiled with V2.03 its 1381 KB
This doesn't cure the "illness", but it might be worth to give UPX
	http://upx.tsx.org/
(mentioned in the FAQ) a try (instead of using the -s flag) to
compress the executable(s).

Greetings from Cologne
Peter

- Raw text -