delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Damian Yerrick <MYNAMEISd_yerrick AT hotmail DOT comNO2CANNEDHAM> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: Sizes of executables |
Organization: | Pin Eight Software http://pineight.8m.com/ |
Message-ID: | <anv7as49ijcg9e7mlimonlkj0lujpbdgg7@4ax.com> |
References: | <MPG DOT 130d0440d417320b989680 AT news1 DOT telia DOT com> <880rb7$2368$1 AT gavrilo DOT mtu DOT ru> |
X-Newsreader: | Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Lines: | 30 |
X-Trace: | /ba9QdUroulFfOfb2CEwr8tl8b3RvxOg2yiUVmnQaxMffB7J3qS/rPeT02EN/FS4KIEf89pRSYlc!SJkaFOkjJJdzNtuj1V1TFkCdIDyUc57XCThz+x6vA/lWMWfFOCNv4v0SVOGonqZGQsHXuoNmydyx!fyiYxcw= |
X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT gte DOT net |
X-Abuse-Info: | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
X-Abuse-Info: | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | Fri, 11 Feb 2000 12:25:51 GMT |
Distribution: | world |
Date: | Fri, 11 Feb 2000 12:25:52 GMT |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000 14:11:40 +0300, "Dmitry Shkarin" <dmitry DOT shkarin AT mtu-net DOT ru> wrote: > Hi, All! >>Hello >>I have some problems in keeping down the sizes of the executables when I >>link with djgpp. There just MUST be a way to strip them down because the >>code of the object files before linking is only a small fraction of the >>huge exe's I get. There seem to be a whole lot of unused code in the >>files. Does anyone have an answer to this? I am a rather newbie at djgpp >>(I have been using turbo c++ before). > I'm new DGJPP user too and I have the same problem: sizes of small >executables(~100KB, I did not ported larger apps yet) are more than twice >larger then for other compilers. I had tried to remove exception code & >rtti(-fno-exceptions & -fno-rtti), but >it does not matter. > Why is it? 1. Each DJGPP program has a mini-extender built in that goes to 32-bit protected mode. This extender takes space. 2. You forgot to strip out debugging information. strip foo.exe 3. You forgot to compress the EXE (also strips it.) http://upx.tsx.org/ -- Damian Yerrick http://yerricde.tripod.com/ Comment on story ideas: http://home1.gte.net/frodo/quickjot.html AOL is sucks! Find out why: http://anti-aol.org/faqs/aas/ View full sig: http://www.rose-hulman.edu/~yerricde/sig.html
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |