From:	"doug" <deleveld AT dds DOT nl>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Portablily of code using GNU flex
Date:	31 Jan 2000 23:33:30 GMT
Organization:	none
Lines:	21
Message-ID:	<01bf6d0d$a91b3c00$b4247d81@default>
References:	<Pine DOT SOL DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 1000131113208 DOT 22347A-100000 AT socrates-a DOT ucl DOT ac DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	client36-180.oprit.rug.nl
X-Trace:	info.service.rug.nl 949361610 20222 129.125.36.180 (31 Jan 2000 23:33:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	newsmaster AT rug DOT nl
NNTP-Posting-Date:	31 Jan 2000 23:33:30 GMT
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1155
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Ali Ahmad Siddiqui <zcees14 AT socrates-a DOT ucl DOT ac DOT uk> schreef in artikel
<Pine DOT SOL DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 1000131113208 DOT 22347A-100000 AT socrates-a DOT ucl DOT ac DOT uk>...
> 
> can some tell me if there is a way of using flex with MSVC or another non
> GNU-compiler. I have tried it and it works fine with MSVC apatr from the
fact
> that libflx.a cannot be linked! So if ne1 knows of how this can be solved
> please help! :)

IIRC, you don't always have to link with libflx.a  I vaguely remeber that 
if you supply some specific functions, then the libflx.a is not needed.

The C code should be *very* portable. That's the whole point behind
flex, that the code be very portable.  If it isn't, I'd suspect a flawed
compiler
before I'd suspect that flex was non-portable...

Doug Eleveld

- Raw text -