Mail Archives: djgpp/2000/01/22/11:31:53
From: | Daniel Barker <sokal AT holyrood DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk>
|
Newsgroups: | alt.windows98,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Subject: | Red Ridge CD format
|
Date: | Sat, 22 Jan 2000 15:44:47 +0000
|
Organization: | Edinburgh University
|
Lines: | 19
|
Message-ID: | <Pine.GSO.4.10.10001221543300.28069-100000@holyrood.ed.ac.uk>
|
NNTP-Posting-Host: | holyrood.ed.ac.uk
|
Mime-Version: | 1.0
|
X-Trace: | scotsman.ed.ac.uk 948555887 10215 129.215.16.14 (22 Jan 2000 15:44:47 GMT)
|
X-Complaints-To: | usenet AT scotsman DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk
|
NNTP-Posting-Date: | 22 Jan 2000 15:44:47 GMT
|
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
I have written some files to CDs. I am told the system wrote the CDs
with Red Ridge extensions. I wrote them using a UNIX (IRIX) system.
Under Windows 98, I can see and read all the files but their names are
simplified to 8.3 format.
Is there a way to make either the Windows 98 system, or at least DJGPP
software (BASH and so on) "see" the full original files names? They are
certainly there, they can be seen by IRIX workstations. But I no longer
have easy access to these, and wish to use the CDs at home on my PC. It
happens that I chose long, similar names for many hundreds of files and
the names do not make much sense in 8.3 form. Unfortunately, it would
not be practical to re-write the data to CD (either with different file
names or in a different format).
Thank you for any help!
--
Daniel Barker.
- Raw text -