Mail Archives: djgpp/2000/01/17/15:29:22
Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
> Simply this was best I was able to do to get version automatically in
> using definition in gcc specs.
Why couldn't '__DJGPP__', '__DJGPP_MINOR__' etc. be put in the specs
file? (updating 'specs' when a new djgpp version is released).
This "feature" thus contradicts the info-pages for -MM, -MMD, -MG
switches:
`-MM'
Like `-M' but the output mentions only the user header files
included with `#include "FILE"'. System header files included
with `#include <FILE>' are omitted.
> Maybe I'm wrong but some my tests with later development versions of
> gcc-2.96 shows that this hack no more works, so it's possible we'll
> have to drop it in future
Looking forward to the next release. Keep up you excellent work!
Gisle V.
- Raw text -