delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Mon, 17 Jan 2000 19:00:01 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Waldemar Schultz <schultz AT mathematik DOT tu-muenchen DOT de> |
cc: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Executable size: limit to acceptability? |
In-Reply-To: | <38833481.B3893568@ma.tum.de> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000117185837.25190C-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | dj-admin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Waldemar Schultz wrote: > IMHO e.g. allegro and grx23 makefiles use -O6 > shouldn't gcc complain beeing passed a no-op Option switch? I don't think so. Otherwise, many Makefile's will have to be changed when using a different compiler. Right now, "make CC=pgcc" is all you need to switch from GCC to PGCC, say. An option that is a no-op cannot hurt.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |