From:	horst DOT kraemer AT t-online DOT de (Horst Kraemer)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: variable declaration in for-header fails??
Date:	Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:13:13 GMT
Organization:	T-Online
Lines:	65
Message-ID:	<387e27c9.16119163@news.btx.dtag.de>
References:	<387d91d5 DOT 333064 AT news DOT netcologne DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	news01.btx.dtag.de 947794293 15161 0306239354-0001 000113 20:11:33
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT t-online DOT de
X-Sender:	0306239354-0001 AT t-dialin DOT net
X-Newsreader:	Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:42:55 GMT, karpfenteich AT gmx DOT de (Peter Karp)
wrote:

> This first way compiles flawlessly with version 2.03:
 
> #include <iostream>
> using namespace std;
 
> int main()
> {
>   int x;
>   for(x=1, cout << x , x++ ;x<=100; x++)
>     cout << ", " << x;
> 
>   cout << endl;
> 
>   return(0);
> }
 
Correct. 
 
> ------------
> but fails, when I define the counter inside the loop declaration:
> 
> #include <iostream>
> using namespace std;
 
> int main()
> {
>   for(int x=1, cout << x , x++ ;x<=100; x++)
>     cout << ", " << x;
> 
>   cout << endl;
> 
>   return(0);
> }
 
> BTW, Borland C++ 3.1 compiles this version without an error, while


This is a open lie ;-) Borland C++ 3.1 doesn't compile it for the same
reason as GNU C++ doesn't. 

And of course BCC++ 3.1 doesn't support the syntax <iostream> and
doesn't support 'namespace'. But even after changing this it doesn't
compile.


         int x=1, cout << x , x++ ;

is illegal. You cannot separate a declaration and an expression like
cout<<x by a comma.

You can use _either_ a declaration like int x=1; _or_ an expression
like

	x=1,...,....,...;


but you can't have both.


Regards
Horst

- Raw text -