delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se (Martin Stromberg) |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: upgrade chaos |
Date: | 12 Jan 2000 16:36:07 GMT |
Organization: | Ericsson Erisoft AB, Sweden |
Lines: | 11 |
Message-ID: | <85iahn$eu3$4@antares.lu.erisoft.se> |
References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000112085053 DOT 28074F AT is> <387C4C68 DOT 2B736BA4 AT uni-leipzig DOT de> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | spica-144.lu.erisoft.se |
X-Newsreader: | TIN [version 1.2 PL2] |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Mark Elliott (elliott AT uni-leipzig DOT de) wrote: : To clarify, I upgraded from v2.01, and am using code originally written for Borland : C, in which it is sometimes necessary to free some more memory than was originally : allocated (i.e. free(var+4);). Given that I kept this style, the explanation above ???!!! Borland must be strange thing if "free(var+4)" works sensibly. Right, MartinS
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |