Mail Archives: djgpp/2000/01/11/22:22:19
From: | "Chad Rabbitt" <chad AT rabbitt DOT com>
|
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Subject: | Re: sigsegv on delete []
|
Date: | 11 Jan 2000 21:17:43 EST
|
Organization: | Concentric Internet Services
|
Message-ID: | <85go87$hht@chronicle.concentric.net>
|
References: | <85ehsn$p0p AT chronicle DOT concentric DOT net>
|
NNTP-Posting-Host: | ts002d01.lon-co.concentric.net
|
X-Priority: | 3
|
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal
|
X-Newsreader: | Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
|
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
|
Lines: | 46
|
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
I just found a sigsegv on another delete [] statement. This delete is in my
my main() function and is a very simple array delete of a simple char array
used for temporary storage. almost exactly the same sigsegv occurs for this
very different area of code. The traceback is similar:
0x..... _free+somenumber
0x..... ___builtin_vec_delete+somenumber, line 0 of new2.cc
0x..... _main+somenumber, line xx of main.cpp
etc...
what is causing sigsegv's on a delete [] statement?
any feedback would be appreciated.
Chad
Chad Rabbitt <chad AT rabbitt DOT com> wrote in message
news:85ehsn$p0p AT chronicle DOT concentric DOT net...
i am wondering if anyone might have any ideas on a sigsegv that occurs on a
delete []? after looking around, it seems i either overran the array at
some point and then when it gets deleted the problem shows up, or i delete
the same array more than once. unfortunately, my co-worker and i can not
find either of these problems in my code. i also used gdb and saw no data
being modified before or after the array, except for the 'in-use' bit by the
memory manager. other notes, the delete [] statement is located in a class
destructor with three other delete [] statement before it. the destructor
works correctly at least one time, usually more than 3 times, depending on
the computer i run the program on. also, if i remove the delete statement
altogether, the program sigsegv's upon exiting the destructor, but before
returning to the calling statement. i don't have the traceback in front of
me, but it generally goes:
0x..... _free+somenumber
0x..... ___builtin_vec_delete+somenumber, line 0 of new2.cc
0x..... _$_9destructorname+somenumber, line 50 of classfile.cpp
etc...
curious if anyone might have some ideas. i've also tried taking all the
code that accesses the array out, and i still get a sigsegv? thanks,
Chad
- Raw text -