From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Why did ID choose DJGPP for Quake?
Date:	Sun, 9 Jan 2000 09:31:28 +0200
Organization:	NetVision Israel
Lines:	16
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000109093110.23866P-100000@is>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000106120722 DOT 20220M-100000 AT is> <gc4d4.271$CJ1 DOT 9007 AT dfiatx1-snr1 DOT gtei DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	is.elta.co.il
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	news.netvision.net.il 947403286 10064 199.203.121.2 (9 Jan 2000 07:34:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT netvision DOT net DOT il
NNTP-Posting-Date:	9 Jan 2000 07:34:46 GMT
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
In-Reply-To:	<gc4d4.271$CJ1.9007@dfiatx1-snr1.gtei.net>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Damian Yerrick wrote:

> > The only reason we don't compile with -mpentium is because
> > we still didn't switch to GCC 2.9x for building the library, and
> > versions of GCC before 2.9x didn't support Pentium-specific
> > optimizations.
> 
> Then I guess I'll have to recompile everything from sources myself
> once the next DJGPP version is released, as one of my systems is
> 486SX-based.

I don't think so.  First, the next version (v2.03) is still compiled
with -m486.  Second, even when we do switch to -mpentium, it should
run on 486SX with no problems, and the slowdown due to Pentium
optimizations should be minimal.

- Raw text -