delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sun, 9 Jan 2000 15:30:09 +0500 (MVT) |
From: | Prashant TR <prashant_tr AT yahoo DOT com> |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Is there any point in MMX? |
In-Reply-To: | <8599nt$1uo3r$1@reader2.wxs.nl> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.LNX.4.10.10001091528400.570-100000@yahoo.com> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | dj-admin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Bas Hamstra wrote: > About MMX: why does one hear so little about it? Could there be any > speedgain for my chess app using MMX? Aren't there a couple of extra > registers, which the x86 needs so badly? With MMX, floating point operations also speed up. IIRC there are 4 MMX processors that work concurrently. So any floating point operations are done much quicker than an identical Intel processor without MMX. Prashant
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |