From:	alain AT qnx DOT com (Alain Magloire)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Porting Watcom 11.0 to djgpp
Date:	8 Jan 2000 00:20:13 GMT
Organization:	QNX Software Systems
Lines:	26
Message-ID:	<855vrt$6es$1@gateway.qnx.com>
References:	<853fat$5q4$1 AT bgtnsc03 DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net> <3875D12C DOT F6931CFF AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <8559hr$49a$1 AT bgtnsc02 DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net> <855ckh$ptl$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <855qoe$au9$1 AT bgtnsc01 DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	qnx.com
X-Trace:	gateway.qnx.com 947290813 6620 209.226.137.1 (8 Jan 2000 00:20:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT qnx DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date:	8 Jan 2000 00:20:13 GMT
X-Newsreader:	TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Charles Wood (cdotrdotwood AT worldnet DOT att DOT net DOT null) wrote:
: I'm only porting to see if my current compiler really has a bug.  I thought
: it shouldn't be a *BIG* deal, whatever like 20 hours for 50k lines of code.

: I wrapped all compiler specific stuff nicely, so it's easy to change later.

: But the lack of the interrupt keyword (which I thought was standard
: (duh...)) really trashes tons of code.

Where on earth did you get the impression that `interrupt' was a keyword ?
It never was on any standard whether ANSI C or K&R, don't know about
the newest yet to be release C9X.

: Well, I hope Watcom has some success seeing the bug, it's only about 16
: lines of code that have to be examined.

Watcom is dead, out of the Compiler business.

: As for porting to DJGPP, I don't think it fits in my timeline.

Good luck.

--
au revoir, alain
----
Aussi haut que l'on soit assis, on est toujours assis que sur son cul !!!

- Raw text -