delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/2000/01/06/16:26:18

Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 20:06:44 +0100 (CET)
From: Wilmer van der Gaast <lintux AT dds DOT nl>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: assembly language and AMD processors
In-Reply-To: <01JKDMTWXER68WWRAH@SLU.EDU>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10001061957590.9618-100000@server.minilinux.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 GAMMELJL AT SLU DOT EDU wrote:

>      Is the assembly language instruction set for an AMD processor 
> identical to the instruction set for the Intel 486 architecture?
> Or is it more like the instruction set for an alpha processor?
>      Thanks. jlg.
Of course they are identical, if they weren't, programs would have
to be written separately for Intel, AMD, Cyrix, IDT, Rise, etc.
These processors are x86 compatible.
You are right about the alpha, that one needs separately written
programs.
You can say that, if it runs the original MSDOS 6, it's x86
compatible.


Greetings,

---------

Wilmer van der Gaast (lintux AT dds DOT nl)
ICQ 55707076

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019