From:	"Andrew Jones" <xluminous AT hotmail DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<MPG DOT 12dd61eaf38f7a598972c AT news DOT creator DOT dp DOT ua>
Subject:	Re: Way to go Allegro :)
Lines:	29
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Message-ID:	<qn2d4.1340$tT2.27675@quark.idirect.com>
Date:	Thu, 06 Jan 2000 15:18:46 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	216.154.3.114
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT idirect DOT com
X-Trace:	quark.idirect.com 947171926 216.154.3.114 (Thu, 06 Jan 2000 10:18:46 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Thu, 06 Jan 2000 10:18:46 EST
Organization:	Internet Direct - http://www.mydirect.com
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Mike Gee <mikegee AT creator DOT dp DOT ua> wrote in message
news:MPG DOT 12dd61eaf38f7a598972c AT news DOT creator DOT dp DOT ua...
> Hi folks!
>
> Found this browsing thru Scitech MGL source
>
> ==== notes.txt begin ====
>
> MGL 5.0 stuff to do:
> --------------------
>
>  . Figure out what people find in Allegro that is not in the MGL.
>
> ==== notes.txt end ======
>
> :)
>
> --
> Best regards, Mike

OTO, MGL can do a lot more than Allegro.  I think Allegro's success is due
mostly to the fact that given how easy it is to use, it's also incredibly
powerful.  MGL is even better, but it can be extremely confusing (and it's
huge).

Andrew Jones.

- Raw text -